Rover 200 1992 vs Volkswagen Golf 1986
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 96 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 49 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 200 is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1145 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 200 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Rover 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |