Rover 200 1992 vs Ford Escort 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 109 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Escort, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Escort. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |