Rover 200 1998 vs Seat Toledo 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 124 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 41 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Rover 200 is 35 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |