Rover 200 1998 vs Mazda 121 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 17.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 45 HP more power than Mazda 121, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda 121. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.1 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 121, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 121. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 121, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |