Rover 200 1998 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 41 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 200 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 580 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 34 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 506 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |