Rover 200 1998 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 15 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Alfa Romeo 145. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 145 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 12 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Rover 200 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |