Rover 200 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Rover 200 engine produces 4 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Peugeot 306. Due to the lower power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 400 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 306 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Rover 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 640 litres | |
| Rover 200 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 446 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |