Rover 200 1996 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 200 engine produces 4 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 145, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Alfa Romeo 145. Due to the lower power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 145 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 12 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Rover 200 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |