Rover 200 1996 vs Seat Ibiza 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 37 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 9.1 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |