Rover 200 1998 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Baleno is a more dynamic driving. Rover 200 engine produces 21 HP less power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Suzuki Baleno. Due to the lower power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Baleno is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 200 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 7 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`460 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |