Rover 200 1998 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 145 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 200 engine produces 15 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 145, but torque is 2 NM more than Alfa Romeo 145. Due to the lower power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 12 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1086 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Rover 200 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo 145. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`460 kg | 1`670 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`060 kg | 1`147 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 523 kg | |
| Rover 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Alfa Romeo 145. Therefore, Alfa Romeo 145 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |