Rover 200 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 17 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| Rover 200 is 33 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 86 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |