Rover 200 1996 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
| By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 200 is 35 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |