Rover 200 1996 vs Seat Ibiza 1996

 
Rover 200
1996 - 1999
Seat Ibiza
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP60 HP
Torque: 127 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds15 seconds
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 200 engine produces 43 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway840 km on highway
610 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m3.85 m
Width: 1.69 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Rover 200 is larger.
Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 304 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1086 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`480no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Seat Ibiza has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv