Rover 200 1996 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 127 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 43 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |