Rover 200 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Peugeot 306. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
| Rover 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |