Rover 200 1996 vs Mazda 323 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 127 NM | 107 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
Rover 200 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`505 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |