Rover 200 1996 vs Mazda 323 1994

 
Rover 200
1996 - 1999
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP75 HP
Torque: 127 NM107 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds13.3 seconds
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.9 l/100km
By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
920 km on highway900 km on highway
610 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.03 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1086 litresno data
Rover 200 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`505
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 323 has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv