Rover 200 1996 vs Hyundai i30 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 3 HP more power than Hyundai i30, but torque is 10 NM less than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 200 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2012 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Hyundai i30 2012 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 33 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 378 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1316 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 74 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |