Rover 200 1991 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 56 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 32 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 23 cm longer than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 309 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |