Rover 200 1990 vs Seat Toledo 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 37 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |