Rover 200 1990 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Rover 200 engine produces 4 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Fiat Croma. Despite less power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.7 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 30 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |