Rover 200 1990 vs Volkswagen Golf 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 37 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.2 | |
| Rover 200 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 200 is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 687 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |