Rover 200 1990 vs Ford Escort 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 22 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.2 | |
|
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.35 m | |
| Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Ford Escort, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Escort. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Ford Escort has
| |