Rover 200 1990 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 22 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.4 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.34 m | |
| Rover 200 is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |