Rover 200 1993 vs Ford Escort 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 32 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.8 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.35 m | |
| Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Ford Escort, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Escort. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |