Rover 200 1993 vs Mazda 323 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 323, but torque is 7 NM less than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.2 | |
| Rover 200 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller, but slightly higher. Rover 200 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Rover 200 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. The Mazda 323 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |