Rover 200 1993 vs Fiat Croma 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 9 HP more power than Fiat Croma, but torque is 73 NM less than Fiat Croma. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.1 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 30 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |