Rover 200 1993 vs Seat Toledo 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Rover 200 and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, but Rover 200 torque is 7 NM less than Seat Toledo. Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.3 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 200 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |