Rover 200 1993 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 and Peugeot 306 have the same engine power, but Rover 200 torque is 6 NM more than Peugeot 306. Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 200 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 5 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 463 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 111 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |