Rover 200 1993 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Rover 200 engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Mazda 323. Despite the higher power, Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
| By specification Rover 200 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 23 cm longer than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 309 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |