Rover 200 1990 vs Seat Toledo 1991

 
Rover 200
1990 - 1994
Seat Toledo
1991 - 1994
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 92 HP71 HP
Torque: 122 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds13.3 seconds
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 200 engine produces 21 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 2 NM less than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.4
Rover 200 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Rover 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.32 m
Width: 1.68 m1.66 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Rover 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 352 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1360 litres
Seat Toledo has more luggage space.
Rover 200 has 198 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`495
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data400
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Seat Toledo has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv