Rover 200 1990 vs Peugeot 306 1999

 
Rover 200
1990 - 1994
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2001
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 92 HP75 HP
Torque: 122 NM111 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds14.9 seconds
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 200 engine produces 17 HP more power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Peugeot 306. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.9
Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.27 m
Width: 1.68 m1.69 m
Height: 1.40 m1.38 m
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 5 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 352 litres463 litres
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space.
Rover 200 has 111 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Peugeot 306 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv