Rover 200 1990 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 122 NM | 111 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
Rover 200 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 200 engine produces 17 HP more power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Peugeot 306. Thanks to more power Rover 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
Rover 200 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 200 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Rover 200 is 5 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 463 litres | |
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 111 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |