Rover 200 1992 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 122 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 138 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.5 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`565 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |