Rover 200 1992 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Golf has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 122 HP | 75 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 138 NM | 140 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | 11.2 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.5 | 5.3 - 9.7 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
| Rover 200 is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 448 litres | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Rover 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`565 | ~ 1`613 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |