Rover 200 1992 vs Volkswagen Golf 1986
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Golf has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 200 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Golf can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volkswagen Golf is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 122 HP | 54 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 138 NM | 96 - 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | 8.3 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.5 | 5.5 - 9.4 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 200 is 23 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 345 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1145 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 200 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Rover 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`565 | ~ 1`463 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |