Rover 200 1992 vs BMW 3 series 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas BMW 3 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Rover 200 is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 122 HP | 143 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 138 NM | 200 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 8.5 | 7.7 - 10.0 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller, but slightly higher. Rover 200 is 27 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`565 | ~ 1`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |