Rover 200 1995 vs Mazda 121 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 50 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 97 - 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.3 seconds | 12.7 - 19 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 7.8 | 6.1 - 7.1 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 121. On average, Rover 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 121, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 200 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | no data | |
|
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 121. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 121, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`527 | ~ 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
| |