Rover 200 1995 vs Seat Ibiza 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Rover 200
1995 - 2000
Seat Ibiza
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 75 - 145 HP50 - 116 HP
Torque: 117 - 210 NM86 - 235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 13.3 seconds9.7 - 19.4 seconds
In general, Rover 200 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Seat Ibiza. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 7.84.8 - 9.2
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Rover 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m3.85 m
Width: 1.69 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Rover 200 is larger.
Rover 200 is 12 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 304 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1086 litres802 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Rover 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 284 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Rover 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`527 kg~ 1`453 kg
Net weight:~ 1`116 kg~ 984 kg
Load capacity:~ 411 kg~ 469 kg
Rover 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Seat Ibiza. Therefore, Seat Ibiza is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Seat Ibiza has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv