Rover 200 1995 vs Hyundai i30 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 137 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.3 seconds | 9.9 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 7.8 | 3.7 - 6.9 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i30. On average, Rover 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 33 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 378 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1316 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Rover 200 has 74 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`527 | ~ 1`873 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |