Rover 200 1995 vs Alfa Romeo 145 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rover 200 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Alfa Romeo 145 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 145 HP | 90 - 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 210 NM | 115 - 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.3 seconds | 8.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 7.8 | 6.4 - 8.5 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 145. On average, Rover 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 145. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 12 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 145, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 304 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1086 litres | 1130 litres | |
| Rover 200 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 145. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo 145 (by 44 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 145. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`527 | ~ 1`709 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Alfa Romeo 145 has
| |