Rover 200 1990 vs Mazda 323 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Rover 200 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 323 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 200 HP | 56 - 106 HP | |
Torque: | 117 - 237 NM | 99 - 151 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 5.9 - 9.2 | |
On average, the Rover 200 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 323. On average, a Rover 200 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 323. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.11 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
Rover 200 is larger. Rover 200 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | 309 litres | |
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity. Rover 200 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`569 | ~ 1`519 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |