Rover 200 1990 vs Mazda 323 1989

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Rover 200
1990 - 1996
Mazda 323
1989 - 1995
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Rover 200 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda 323 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.3 - 1.8

Performance

Power: 75 - 200 HP56 - 106 HP
Torque: 117 - 237 NM99 - 151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 - 12.5 seconds8.8 - 16.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 8.95.9 - 9.2
On average, the Rover 200 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 323. On average, a Rover 200 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 323.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.11 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.40 m1.36 m
Rover 200 is larger.
Rover 200 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 352 litres309 litres
Rover 200 has more luggage capacity.
Rover 200 has 43 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 323.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`569~ 1`519
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data800
Pros and Cons: Rover 200 has
  • roomier boot
Mazda 323 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv