Rover 200 1990 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 200 is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 200 HP | 71 - 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 237 NM | 119 - 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12.5 seconds | 9.2 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 6.4 - 11.6 | |
|
Rover 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, Rover 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 200 is smaller. Rover 200 is 20 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 352 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 200 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`569 | ~ 1`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 200 has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |