Rover 100 1990 vs Kia Pride 1991

 
Rover 100
1990 - 1998
Kia Pride
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP73 HP
Torque: 117 NM135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds13.7 seconds
Rover 100 is more dynamic to drive.
Rover 100 engine produces 2 HP more power than Kia Pride, but torque is 18 NM less than Kia Pride. Thanks to more power Rover 100 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.97.5
The Rover 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 100 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Pride, which means that by driving the Rover 100 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres37 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 500 km in combined cycle490 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 3.52 m3.56 m
Width: 1.56 m1.60 m
Height: 1.38 m1.46 m
Rover 100 is smaller.
Rover 100 is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Pride, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 100 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 229 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
552 litres510 litres
Rover 100 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Rover 100 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Kia Pride. The Kia Pride may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 100 (by 42 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 100 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Pride, which means Rover 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3101`270
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Rover 100 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv