Rover 100 1990 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 103 HP | 45 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 127 NM | 76 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 14.8 seconds | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.9 | 4.7 - 8.6 | |
|
Rover 100 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.52 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Rover 100 is smaller. Rover 100 is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 100 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 229 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
552 litres | 975 litres | |
| Rover 100 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 423 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 100 is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Rover 100 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`300 | ~ 1`401 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 100 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |