Rover 100 1990 vs Kia Pride 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 1.1 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 103 HP | 52 - 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 127 NM | 86 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 14.8 seconds | 13.6 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.9 | 6.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Rover 100 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Pride. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.52 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Rover 100 is smaller. Rover 100 is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Pride, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 100 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 229 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
552 litres | 750 litres | |
|
Kia Pride has more luggage space. Rover 100 has 101 litres less trunk space than the Kia Pride. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Pride (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 100 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Pride, which means Rover 100 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`300 | ~ 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 100 has
|
Kia Pride has
| |