Rover 100 1990 vs Fiat Panda 1986
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Rover 100 is available only with front wheel drive, while Fiat Panda can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.4 | 0.8 - 1.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 103 HP | 34 - 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 127 NM | 57 - 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 14.8 seconds | 14.9 - 23 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 6.9 | 5.9 - 8.6 | |
|
Rover 100 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Panda. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.52 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.56 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 100 is larger, but lower. Rover 100 is 11 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Rover 100 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 229 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
552 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 100 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`300 | ~ 814 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 100 has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |