Renault VEL Satis 2005 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Renault VEL Satis engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Renault VEL Satis reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault VEL Satis consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault VEL Satis could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Renault VEL Satis is larger. Renault VEL Satis is 13 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault VEL Satis is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault VEL Satis has 40 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Renault VEL Satis uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault VEL Satis is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault VEL Satis has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |