Renault Twingo 2001 vs Kia Picanto 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Twingo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Twingo engine produces 10 HP more power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Kia Picanto. Thanks to more power Renault Twingo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Twingo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Twingo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Twingo could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Twingo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Twingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai i10 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Twingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.43 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Renault Twingo is 7 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Twingo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1095 litres | 882 litres | |
| Renault Twingo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 213 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`260 kg | 1`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 850 kg | 966 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 410 kg | 384 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Twingo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |