Renault Twingo 2007 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Renault Twingo engine produces 17 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Renault Twingo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Twingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Twingo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Renault Twingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Twingo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Twingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Twingo is smaller. Renault Twingo is 10 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Twingo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 230 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
959 litres | 562 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Twingo has 17 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 397 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Twingo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Renault Twingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Suzuki Swift has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Twingo, so Suzuki Swift quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Twingo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |