Renault Twingo 2014 vs Peugeot 107 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 107 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Twingo engine produces 2 HP more power than Peugeot 107, but torque is 2 NM less than Peugeot 107. Despite the higher power, Renault Twingo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Twingo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that by driving the Renault Twingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Twingo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Twingo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Dacia Sandero, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 107 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 107 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.47 m | |
| Renault Twingo is 17 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Twingo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 219 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 712 litres | |
|
Renault Twingo has more luggage capacity. Renault Twingo has 80 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.7 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Twingo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Renault Twingo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Twingo scores higher in safety tests, but Peugeot 107 is better rated in child safety tests. The Peugeot 107 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Twingo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Twingo has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |