Renault Twingo 2014 vs Hyundai i10 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 66 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 NM | 94 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Twingo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Twingo engine produces 4 HP more power than Hyundai i10, but torque is 3 NM less than Hyundai i10. Thanks to more power Renault Twingo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i10 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Twingo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Renault Twingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Twingo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i10 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Dacia Sandero, Smart ForFour | Used also on Kia Picanto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i10 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.60 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Twingo is smaller, but higher. Renault Twingo is 7 cm shorter than the Hyundai i10, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Twingo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 219 litres | 252 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
|
Hyundai i10 has more luggage space. Renault Twingo has 33 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.7 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Twingo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Hyundai i10, which means Renault Twingo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Twingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Twingo, so Renault Twingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Twingo has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |